Electric: 86% lower CPL on Meta than on LinkedIn
Electric reached the right executives on LinkedIn at a cost per lead it couldn’t scale. We rebuilt the same firmographic targeting on Meta from third-party data and validated every lead. Cost per lead fell 86% and click-through ran 4x LinkedIn’s.
Client
Electric
Role
Media Strategy, Media Planning, Buying & Optimization
Paid Media Campaign

Key Takeaway
Electric’s buyers were on Meta too. LinkedIn’s native targeting was the only reason to pay LinkedIn’s CPMs, so we rebuilt that targeting off-platform from third-party data: company size, seniority, industry and role.
Context
LinkedIn worked, at a cost that didn’t scale.
IT unicorn Electric was scaling demand gen on LinkedIn, aimed at C-suite and senior decision-makers. Engagement was strong and the ideal customer profile was set, but LinkedIn’s CPMs made lead acquisition unsustainable at scale.
The question was whether that firmographic precision could be rebuilt on a platform with better economics.

Approach
Why we moved the targeting off LinkedIn.
Solution
Firmographic targeting, rebuilt on Meta.
Results
Same buyers, 86% lower cost per lead.
Firmographic targeting rebuilt from third-party data held its precision on Meta.
Social proof and case-study creative outperformed every other format.
Persona-level data set the budget more efficiently than LinkedIn’s split.
-86%
CPL on Meta vs. LinkedIn
4x
CTR on Meta vs. LinkedIn
Tell us where you are. We’ll tell you what we can do.